All times are UTC - 5 hours
Moderator: Forum Mods
Grit Snipe wrote:You know how somtimes all luck based CO' are banned including Flak well Flak is a horrible CO and is almost never picked.
luck basedCO list:
Flak:Horrible CO with -10percent and +20 percent luck
Nell:A well balanced CO that gets +20percent more luck but no bad luck
Jugger:Great CO with -10percent bad luck and +30percent good luck
I sujest picking Nell and Jugger but never Flak.
Divva wrote: Yeah they are a part of game, but you have to admit the game is flawed, not perfect balanced for competitive play.
Divva wrote:Maybe it's not bad to run an lucky tourney for fun. But I don't really want to see them as my opponent in serious games in the colosseum or global league. I completely agree with hellraider. It's horrible to play the game that you can't calculate your opponent's next move. Yeah they are a part of game, but you have to admit the game is flawed, not perfect balanced for competitive play.
ichbinsehselber wrote:If you require that a theoretical genius who always makes the best move will win 100% of games even against other very good players, then this is true. And then you will want a deterministic game (which AWBW never was and also never was intended to be)
If you only require that being a better player will lead to wins in most of the games than you can keep luck in.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest